Here is my reading note for the book 'Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing: An Introduction ' by Hidetoshi Nishimori . I am still not quite clear about this field so please discuss your insights and understanding with me if you are also interested.
Prerequisites
Basic Notions in Statistical Physics
State distribution:
P ( state i ) = e − β H ( state i ) Z , Z = ∑ all state e − β H ( state i ) \begin{align}
\mathbb{P}\left( \text{state}_i \right)=\dfrac{e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}(\text{state}_i)}}{Z},\quad Z=\sum_{\text{all
state}}e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}(\text{state}_i)}
\end{align} P ( state i ) = Z e − β H ( state i ) , Z = all state ∑ e − β H ( state i )
Free Energy:
F ( β ) ≡ − 1 β log Z \begin{align}
F(\beta )\equiv -\dfrac{1}{\beta }\log Z
\end{align} F ( β ) ≡ − β 1 log Z
(Canonical) Entropy:
S ( β ) = − ∑ i e − β H i Z log e − β H i Z = ∑ i e − β H i Z [ β H i + log Z ] = − ∑ i β Z ∂ e − β H i ∂ β + log Z = − β ∂ log Z ∂ β + log Z = − β 2 ∂ 1 β log Z ∂ β = β 2 ∂ F ∂ β \begin{align}
S(\beta )=&-\sum_{i}\dfrac{e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{Z}\log\dfrac{e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{Z}\\
=&\sum_{i}\dfrac{e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{Z}\left[\beta \mathcal{H}_i+\log Z \right]\\
=&-\sum_i \dfrac{\beta }{Z}\dfrac{\partial^{} e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{\partial \beta ^{}}+\log Z\\
=&-\beta \dfrac{\partial^{} \log Z}{\partial \beta ^{}}+\log Z\\
=&-\beta ^2\dfrac{\partial^{} \dfrac{1}{\beta }\log Z}{\partial \beta ^{}}\\
=&\beta ^2\dfrac{\partial^{} F}{\partial \beta ^{}}
\end{align} S ( β ) = = = = = = − i ∑ Z e − β H i log Z e − β H i i ∑ Z e − β H i [ β H i + log Z ] − i ∑ Z β ∂ β ∂ e − β H i + log Z − β ∂ β ∂ log Z + log Z − β 2 ∂ β ∂ β 1 log Z β 2 ∂ β ∂ F
Average energy (internal energy):
U = ∑ i H i e − β H i Z = − 1 Z ∑ i ∂ e − β H i ∂ β = − ∂ log Z ∂ β = ∂ β F ∂ β \begin{align}
U=\sum_{i}\mathcal{H}_i\dfrac{e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{Z}=&-\dfrac{1}{Z}\sum_{i}\dfrac{\partial^{} e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}_i}}{\partial \beta ^{}}\\
=&-\dfrac{\partial^{} \log Z}{\partial \beta ^{}}\\
=&\dfrac{\partial^{} \beta F}{\partial \beta ^{}}
\end{align} U = i ∑ H i Z e − β H i = = = − Z 1 i ∑ ∂ β ∂ e − β H i − ∂ β ∂ log Z ∂ β ∂ β F
Legendre transform bet. U U U and F F F :
U = ∂ β F ∂ β = F + β ∂ F ∂ β = F + S β \begin{align}
U=&\dfrac{\partial^{} \beta F}{\partial \beta ^{}}\\
=&F+\beta \dfrac{\partial^{} F}{\partial \beta ^{}}\\
=&F+\dfrac{S}{\beta }
\end{align} U = = = ∂ β ∂ β F F + β ∂ β ∂ F F + β S
Average free energy:
f = lim N → ∞ 1 N F ( β , N ) \begin{align}
f=\lim_{N\to \infty}\dfrac{1}{N}F(\beta ,N)
\end{align} f = N → ∞ lim N 1 F ( β , N )
Useful Lemmas
Lemma 1: Gaussian integral
∫ e − α x 2 + β x d x = π α e β 2 4 α ( R e ( α ) ≥ 0 ) e a x 2 2 = a 2 π ∫ e − a m 2 2 + a m x d m \begin{align}
\int e^{-\alpha x^2+\beta x} \,\mathrm{d}x=&\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\alpha }}e^{\frac{\beta ^2}{4\alpha }}\quad (\mathrm{Re}(\alpha )\geq 0)\\
e^{\frac{ax^2}{2}}=&\sqrt{\dfrac{a}{2\pi}}\int e^{-\frac{am^2}{2}+amx} \,\mathrm{d}m
\end{align} ∫ e − α x 2 + β x d x = e 2 a x 2 = α π e 4 α β 2 ( Re ( α ) ≥ 0 ) 2 π a ∫ e − 2 a m 2 + am x d m
Lemma 2: delta function
δ ( x ) = { 0 , x ≠ 0 ∞ , x = 0 , w . r . t . ∫ R δ ( x ) d x = 1 ∫ R f ( x ) δ ( x − a ) d x = f ( a ) Fourier: { 1 = ∫ R e − i k x δ ( x ) d x δ ( x ) = 1 2 π ∫ R e i k x d k \begin{align}
&\delta(x)=\begin{cases}
0,&x\neq 0\\
\infty,&x=0
\end{cases},\quad w.r.t. \int_\mathbb{R}\delta (x)\,\mathrm{d}x=1\\
&\int _\mathbb{R}f(x)\delta (x-a) \,\mathrm{d}x=f(a)\\
&\text{Fourier:}\begin{cases}
1=\int_{\mathbb{R}}e^{-ikx}\delta (x)\,\mathrm{d}x\\
\delta (x)=\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int _\mathbb{R}e^{ikx} \,\mathrm{d}k
\end{cases}
\end{align} δ ( x ) = { 0 , ∞ , x = 0 x = 0 , w . r . t . ∫ R δ ( x ) d x = 1 ∫ R f ( x ) δ ( x − a ) d x = f ( a ) Fourier: ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 = ∫ R e − ik x δ ( x ) d x δ ( x ) = 2 π 1 ∫ R e ik x d k
Lemma 3: delta function + Gaussian integral = Fourier*2
f ( a ) = ∫ R f ( x ) δ ( x − a ) d x = ∫ R ∫ R 1 2 π f ( x ) e i k ( x − a ) d k d x \begin{align}
f(a)=&\int _\mathbb{R}f(x)\delta (x-a) \,\mathrm{d}x\\
=&\int _\mathbb{R}\int_\mathbb{R}\dfrac{1}{2\pi}f(x)e^{ik(x-a)}\,\mathrm{d}k \,\mathrm{d}x
\end{align} f ( a ) = = ∫ R f ( x ) δ ( x − a ) d x ∫ R ∫ R 2 π 1 f ( x ) e ik ( x − a ) d k d x
Chapter 2 of the Book
Problem to study
Say we are solving some combinatorial problem arg min x H ( x , C ) \mathop{\arg\min}\limits_{x} \mathcal{H}(x,\mathcal{C}) x arg min H ( x , C ) , where C \mathcal{C} C denotes the configuration of the parameters of the problem.
Solve the problem for some specific/explicit C \mathcal{C} C
If C \mathcal{C} C has some distribution, we can solve this type of problem of C ∼ f C \mathcal{C}\sim f_\mathcal{C} C ∼ f C
Example:
TSP (Travaling Salesman Problem), C \mathcal{C} C for locations and path, its distribution represents `this kinds of map to travel'
ML (Machine learning), C \mathcal{C} C for training data, its distribution represents the ability to generalize the model
Self-averaging Property
Studying the 'averaging property' v.s. 'specific problem'
self averaging: when size of the system grows, the average of some observable [ O ( x ) ] C [O(x)]_\mathcal{C} [ O ( x ) ] C 'represents almost all typical cases ' of C \mathcal{C} C .
f f f is a self-averaging quantity → \to → evaluate [ f ] [f] [ f ] instead of studying any explicit f ( x , C ) f(x,\mathcal{C}) f ( x , C )
[ f ] = lim N → ∞ 1 N [ F ] C lim N → ∞ − 1 N β [ log Z ] C \begin{align}
[f]=&\lim_{N\to\infty}\dfrac{1}{N}[F]_\mathcal{C}\lim_{N\to\infty}-\dfrac{1}{N\beta }[\log Z]_\mathcal{C}
\end{align} [ f ] = N → ∞ lim N 1 [ F ] C N → ∞ lim − N β 1 [ log Z ] C
Replica trick:
[ log Z ] = [ 1 n log Z n ] = lim n → 0 [ Z n − 1 n ] = lim n → 0 [ Z n ] − 1 n \begin{align}
[\log Z]=[\dfrac{1}{n}\log Z^n]=\lim_{n\to 0}[\dfrac{Z^n-1}{n}]=\lim_{n\to 0}\dfrac{[Z^n]-1}{n}\tag{2.6}
\end{align} [ log Z ] = [ n 1 log Z n ] = n → 0 lim [ n Z n − 1 ] = n → 0 lim n [ Z n ] − 1 ( 2.6 )
Idea: first evaluate [ Z n ] [Z^n] [ Z n ] at n ∈ N + n\in\mathbb{N}^+ n ∈ N + , then use some other trick to evaluate n → 0 n\to 0 n → 0 with 'analytically continuation'
Comments on relica trick:
Avoid averaging on log \log log , better calculation
Validity of the continuation methods? commonly used method: Replica symmetry splution / Parisi equation
SK Model
Hamiltonian of Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model : i , j i,j i , j for sites
H = − ∑ i < j J i j S i S j − h ∑ i S i , i , j = 1 , 2 , … , N \begin{align}
\mathcal{H}=-\sum_{i<j}J_{ij}S_iS_j-h\sum_{i}S_i,\quad i,j=1,2,\ldots,N\tag{2.7}
\end{align} H = − i < j ∑ J ij S i S j − h i ∑ S i , i , j = 1 , 2 , … , N ( 2.7 )
Distribution of bond J i j J_{ij} J ij , say normal distribution J i j ∼ i i d N ( J 0 N , J 2 N ) J_{ij}\sim_{iid}\mathcal{N}(\dfrac{J_0}{N},\dfrac{J^2}{N}) J ij ∼ ii d N ( N J 0 , N J 2 )
P ( J i j ) = N 2 π J 2 exp { − N ( J i j − J 0 ) 2 2 J 2 } \begin{align}
\mathbb{P}\left( J_{ij} \right) =\sqrt{\dfrac{N}{2\pi J^2}}\exp\left\{ -\dfrac{N(J_{ij}-J_0)^2}{2J^2} \right\}\tag{2.8}
\end{align} P ( J ij ) = 2 π J 2 N exp { − 2 J 2 N ( J ij − J 0 ) 2 } ( 2.8 )
Comment: J ˉ i j = J 0 / N \bar{J}_{ij}=J_0\big/N J ˉ ij = J 0 / N to ensures H \mathcal{H} H grows linearly with N N N . (H \mathcal{H} H should be extensive quantity )
[ F ] = − 1 β [ log Z ] = − 1 β ∫ log Z ∏ i < j P ( J i j ) d J i j \begin{align}
[F]=-\dfrac{1}{\beta }[\log Z]=-\dfrac{1}{\beta }\int \log Z \,\prod_{i<j}\mathbb{P}\left( J_{ij} \right)\,\mathrm{d}J_{ij}\tag{2.5}
\end{align} [ F ] = − β 1 [ log Z ] = − β 1 ∫ log Z i < j ∏ P ( J ij ) d J ij ( 2.5 )
Replica trick:
[ Z n ] = ∫ ( ∑ { S i = 1 N } e − β H ( S i = 1 N ) ) n ∏ i < j P ( J i j ) d J i j \begin{align}
[Z^n]=\int \left(\sum_{\{S_{i=1}^N\}}e^{-\beta \mathcal{H}(S_{i=1}^N)}\right)^n \,\prod_{i<j}\mathbb{P}\left( J_{ij} \right)\,\mathrm{d}J_{ij}\tag{2.5}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = ∫ { S i = 1 N } ∑ e − β H ( S i = 1 N ) n i < j ∏ P ( J ij ) d J ij ( 2.5 )
Key steps:
replica: ( ∑ ⋅ ) n → ( ∑ r e p l i c a 1 ) × ( ∑ r e p l i c a 2 ) × … × ( ∑ r e p l i c a n ) (\sum_{}\,\cdot \,)^n\to (\sum_{\mathrm{replica} 1 })\times (\sum_{\mathrm{replica} 2 })\times \ldots\times (\sum_{\mathrm{replica} n }) ( ∑ ⋅ ) n → ( ∑ replica 1 ) × ( ∑ replica 2 ) × … × ( ∑ replica n ) , use S α S^\alpha S α to denote replicaα \alpha α
[ Z n ] = ∫ ( ∑ { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∏ α = 1 n e − β H ( S i = 1 α N ) ) ∏ i < j P ( J i j ) d J i j = ∫ ( ∑ { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp { β ∑ i < j J i j ∑ α = 1 n S i α S j α + β h ∑ i ∑ α = 1 n S i α } ) ∏ i < j P ( J i j ) d J i j = L e m m a 1 ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp { 1 N ∑ i < j ( 1 2 β 2 J 2 ∑ α , β S i α S j α S i β S j β + β J 0 ∑ α S i α S j α ) + β h ∑ i ∑ α S i α } \begin{align}
[Z^n]=&\int \left(\sum_{\{S_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\prod_{\alpha =1}^ne^{-\beta \mathcal{H}(S_{i=1}^{\alpha N})}\right) \,\prod_{i<j}\mathbb{P}\left( J_{ij} \right)\,\mathrm{d}J_{ij}\tag{2.10}\\
=&\int \left(\sum_{\{S_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\left\{ \beta \sum_{i<j}J_{ij}\sum_{\alpha =1}^nS_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha +\beta h\sum_{i}\sum_{\alpha =1}^nS_i^\alpha \right\}\right) \,\prod_{i<j}\mathbb{P}\left( J_{ij} \right)\,\mathrm{d}J_{ij}\\
\mathop{=}\limits_{Lemma1} &\sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\Bigg\{ \dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i<j}\Bigg(\dfrac{1}{2}\beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha ,\beta }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta \\
&\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad+\beta J_0\sum_{\alpha }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha \Bigg)+\beta h\sum_{i}\sum_{\alpha }S_i^\alpha \Bigg\}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = = L e mma 1 = ∫ { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ α = 1 ∏ n e − β H ( S i = 1 α N ) i < j ∏ P ( J ij ) d J ij ∫ { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp { β i < j ∑ J ij α = 1 ∑ n S i α S j α + β h i ∑ α = 1 ∑ n S i α } i < j ∏ P ( J ij ) d J ij { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp { N 1 i < j ∑ ( 2 1 β 2 J 2 α , β ∑ S i α S j α S i β S j β + β J 0 α ∑ S i α S j α ) + β h i ∑ α ∑ S i α } ( 2.10 )
Expectation E \mathbb{E} E using gaussian integral
[ Z n ] = ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp { 1 N ∑ i < j ( 1 2 β 2 J 2 ∑ α , β S i α S j α S i β S j β + β J 0 ∑ α S i α S j α ) + β h ∑ i ∑ α S i α } \begin{align}
[Z^n]=\sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\Bigg\{ \dfrac{1}{N} &\sum_{i<j}\Bigg(\dfrac{1}{2}\beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha ,\beta }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta\\
& +\beta J_0\sum_{\alpha }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha \Bigg)+\beta h\sum_{i}\sum_{\alpha }S_i^\alpha \Bigg\} \tag{2.11}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp { N 1 i < j ∑ ( 2 1 β 2 J 2 α , β ∑ S i α S j α S i β S j β + β J 0 α ∑ S i α S j α ) + β h i ∑ α ∑ S i α } ( 2.11 )
Note:
S i α ∈ { + 1 , − 1 } ⇒ S i α S i α = 1 S_i^\alpha \in\{+1,-1\}\Rightarrow S_i^\alpha S_i^\alpha =1 S i α ∈ { + 1 , − 1 } ⇒ S i α S i α = 1 .
∑ α , β S i α S j α S i β S j β = n + 2 ∑ α < β S i α S j α S i β S j β \sum_{\alpha ,\beta }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta=n+2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta ∑ α , β S i α S j α S i β S j β = n + 2 ∑ α < β S i α S j α S i β S j β
∑ i < j S i α S j α S i β S j β = − N + 1 2 ∑ i , j S i α S j α S i β S j β = − N + 1 2 ( ∑ i = 1 N S i α S i β ) 2 \sum_{i<j}S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta=-N+\dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j}S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha S_i^\beta S_j^\beta=-N+\dfrac{1}{2}\left(\sum_{i=1}^NS_i^\alpha S_i^\beta \right)^2 ∑ i < j S i α S j α S i β S j β = − N + 2 1 ∑ i , j S i α S j α S i β S j β = − N + 2 1 ( ∑ i = 1 N S i α S i β ) 2
∑ i < j S i α S j α = − N + 1 2 ∑ i , j S i α S j α = − N + 1 2 ( ∑ i = 1 N S i α ) 2 \sum_{i<j}S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha =-N+\dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j}S_i^\alpha S_j^\alpha =-N+\dfrac{1}{2}\left(\sum_{i=1}^NS_i^\alpha \right)^2 ∑ i < j S i α S j α = − N + 2 1 ∑ i , j S i α S j α = − N + 2 1 ( ∑ i = 1 N S i α ) 2
[ Z n ] = exp [ N n β 2 J 2 4 ] ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp { β 2 J 2 2 N ∑ α < β ( ∑ i S i α S i β ) 2 + β J 0 2 N ∑ α ( ∑ i S i α ) 2 + β h ∑ i ∑ α S i α } \begin{align}
[Z^n]=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{Nn\beta ^2J^2}{4} \right]\sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\Bigg\{ \dfrac{\beta ^2J^2}{2N}\sum_{\alpha<\beta}\left(\sum_iS^\alpha_iS^\beta _i \right)^2\\
&+\dfrac{\beta J_0}{2N}\sum_{\alpha }\left(\sum_i S_i^\alpha \right)^2+\beta h\sum_i\sum_\alpha S_i^\alpha \Bigg\}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = exp [ 4 N n β 2 J 2 ] { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp { 2 N β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ ( i ∑ S i α S i β ) 2 + 2 N β J 0 α ∑ ( i ∑ S i α ) 2 + β h i ∑ α ∑ S i α }
Change summation indices
[ Z n ] = exp [ N n β 2 J 2 4 ] ⋅ ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp { β 2 J 2 2 N ∑ α < β ( ∑ i S i α S i β ) 2 + β J 0 2 N ∑ α ( ∑ i S i α ) 2 + β h ∑ i ∑ α S i α } \begin{align}
[Z^n]=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{Nn\beta ^2J^2}{4} \right]\cdot \sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\Bigg\{ \dfrac{\beta ^2J^2}{2N}\sum_{\alpha<\beta}\left(\sum_iS^\alpha_iS^\beta _i \right)^2\\
&+\dfrac{\beta J_0}{2N}\sum_{\alpha }\left(\sum_i S_i^\alpha \right)^2+\beta h\sum_i\sum_\alpha S_i^\alpha \Bigg\}\\ \tag{2.12}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = exp [ 4 N n β 2 J 2 ] ⋅ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp { 2 N β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ ( i ∑ S i α S i β ) 2 + 2 N β J 0 α ∑ ( i ∑ S i α ) 2 + β h i ∑ α ∑ S i α }
Use lemma 1 to linearize ( ∑ i ) 2 \left( \sum_{i } \right)^2 ( ∑ i ) 2 term, integral dummy variable taken as q α β q_{\alpha \beta } q α β and m α m_\alpha m α
[ Z n ] = exp { N n β 2 J 2 4 } ∫ ∏ α < β d q α β ∏ α d m α ⋅ exp [ − N β 2 J 2 2 ∑ α < β q α β 2 − N β J 0 2 ∑ α m α 2 ] ⋅ ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n exp [ β 2 J 2 ∑ α < β ∑ i S i α S i β + β ∑ α ( J 0 m α + h ) ∑ i S i α ] \begin{align}
[Z^n]=&\exp\left\{ \dfrac{Nn\beta ^2J^2}{4} \right\}\int \prod_{\alpha <\beta }\,\mathrm{d}q_{\alpha \beta }\prod_{\alpha } \,\mathrm{d}m_\alpha \\
\cdot&\exp\left[ -\dfrac{N\beta ^2J^2}{2}\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }^2-\dfrac{N\beta J_0}{2}\sum_\alpha m_\alpha ^2 \right]\\
\cdot&\sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\left[ \beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }\sum_iS_i^\alpha S_i^\beta+\beta \sum_\alpha (J_0m_\alpha +h)\sum_iS_i^\alpha \right]\tag{2.13}
\end{align} [ Z n ] = ⋅ ⋅ exp { 4 N n β 2 J 2 } ∫ α < β ∏ d q α β α ∏ d m α exp − 2 N β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β 2 − 2 N β J 0 α ∑ m α 2 { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n ∑ exp β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ i ∑ S i α S i β + β α ∑ ( J 0 m α + h ) i ∑ S i α ( 2.13 )
Reduction of ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n \sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n} ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n : equivalent for all i i i , ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n → ( ∑ α ) N \sum_{\{S^\alpha |_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n}\to (\sum_{\alpha })^N ∑ { S α ∣ i = 1 N } α = 1 n → ( ∑ α ) N
[ Z n ] = exp { N n β 2 J 2 4 } ∫ ∏ α < β d q α β ∏ α d m α ⋅ exp [ − N β 2 J 2 2 ∑ α < β q α β 2 − N β J 0 2 ∑ α m α 2 ] ⋅ exp [ N log ∑ { S α } α = 1 n exp [ β 2 J 2 ∑ α < β q α β S α S β + β ∑ α ( J 0 m α + h ) S α ] ] = exp { N n β 2 J 2 4 } ∫ ∏ α < β d q α β ∏ α d m α ⋅ exp N { − β 2 J 2 2 ∑ α < β q α β 2 − β J 0 2 ∑ α m α 2 + log ∑ { S α } α = 1 n exp [ β 2 J 2 ∑ α < β q α β S α S β + β ∑ α ( J 0 m α + h ) S α ] } : = ∫ ∏ α < β d q α β ∏ α d m α exp { N Ξ ( q α β , m α ) } Ξ ≡ n β 2 J 2 4 − β 2 J 2 2 ∑ α < β q α β 2 − β J 0 2 ∑ α m α 2 + log ∑ { S α } α = 1 n exp [ β 2 J 2 ∑ α < β q α β S α S β + β ∑ α ( J 0 m α + h ) S α ] \begin{align}
[Z^n]=&\exp\left\{ \dfrac{Nn\beta ^2J^2}{4} \right\}\int \prod_{\alpha <\beta }\,\mathrm{d}q_{\alpha \beta }\prod_{\alpha } \,\mathrm{d}m_\alpha \\
\cdot&\exp\left[ -\dfrac{N\beta ^2J^2}{2}\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }^2-\dfrac{N\beta J_0}{2}\sum_\alpha m_\alpha ^2 \right]\\
\cdot&\exp\left[ N\log \sum_{\{S^\alpha \}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\left[ \beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta +\beta \sum_\alpha (J_0m_\alpha +h)S^\alpha \right] \right]\tag{2.15}\\
=&\exp\left\{ \dfrac{Nn\beta ^2J^2}{4} \right\}\int \prod_{\alpha <\beta }\,\mathrm{d}q_{\alpha \beta }\prod_{\alpha } \,\mathrm{d}m_\alpha\\
\cdot&\exp N\Big\{ -\dfrac{\beta ^2J^2}{2}\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q^2_{\alpha \beta }-\dfrac{\beta J_0}{2}\sum_\alpha m_\alpha ^2 \\
&+\log \sum_{\{S^\alpha \}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\left[ \beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta +\beta \sum_\alpha (J_0m_\alpha +h)S^\alpha \right]\Big\}\\
:=&\int \prod_{\alpha <\beta }\,\mathrm{d}q_{\alpha \beta }\prod_{\alpha } \,\mathrm{d}m_\alpha \exp\left\{ N\Xi(q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha ) \right\}\\
\Xi\equiv&\dfrac{n\beta ^2J^2}{4} -\dfrac{\beta ^2J^2}{2}\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q^2_{\alpha \beta }-\dfrac{\beta J_0}{2}\sum_\alpha m_\alpha ^2 \\
&+\log \sum_{\{S^\alpha \}_{\alpha =1}^n}\exp\left[ \beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta +\beta \sum_\alpha (J_0m_\alpha +h)S^\alpha \right]
\end{align} [ Z n ] = ⋅ ⋅ = ⋅ := Ξ ≡ exp { 4 N n β 2 J 2 } ∫ α < β ∏ d q α β α ∏ d m α exp − 2 N β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β 2 − 2 N β J 0 α ∑ m α 2 exp N log { S α } α = 1 n ∑ exp β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β S α S β + β α ∑ ( J 0 m α + h ) S α exp { 4 N n β 2 J 2 } ∫ α < β ∏ d q α β α ∏ d m α exp N { − 2 β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β 2 − 2 β J 0 α ∑ m α 2 + log { S α } α = 1 n ∑ exp β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β S α S β + β α ∑ ( J 0 m α + h ) S α } ∫ α < β ∏ d q α β α ∏ d m α exp { N Ξ ( q α β , m α ) } 4 n β 2 J 2 − 2 β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β 2 − 2 β J 0 α ∑ m α 2 + log { S α } α = 1 n ∑ exp β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β S α S β + β α ∑ ( J 0 m α + h ) S α ( 2.15 )
Thermal limit N → ∞ N\to\infty N → ∞ , the integral is dominated by max q α β , m α Ξ \max_{q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha }\Xi max q α β , m α Ξ term, i.e.
[ Z n ] ∝ exp { N Ξ } , w . r . t . q α β , m α = arg max q α β , m α Ξ ( q α β , m α ) \begin{align}
[Z^n]\propto \exp\left\{ N\Xi \right\},\quad w.r.t. q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha =\mathop{\arg\max}\limits_{q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha }\Xi(q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha )
\end{align} [ Z n ] ∝ exp { N Ξ } , w . r . t . q α β , m α = q α β , m α arg max Ξ ( q α β , m α )
Average free energy should be finite: [ f ] = − 1 β lim N → ∞ lim n → 0 [ Z n ] − 1 n N < ∞ [f]=-\dfrac{1}{\beta }\lim_{N\to\infty}\lim_{n\to 0}\dfrac{[Z^n]-1}{nN}<\infty [ f ] = − β 1 lim N → ∞ lim n → 0 n N [ Z n ] − 1 < ∞
[ f ] = − 1 β { lim n → 0 lim N → ∞ [ Z n ] − 1 n N } = − 1 β { lim n → 0 lim N → ∞ exp { N Ξ } − 1 n N } = N Ξ → 0 − 1 β lim n → 0 Ξ n = 1 β { β 2 J 2 4 n ∑ α ≠ β q α β 2 + β J 0 2 n ∑ α m α 2 − 1 4 β 2 J 2 − 1 n log ∑ { S α } α = 1 n e L } L = β 2 J 2 ∑ α < β q α β S α S β + β ∑ α ( J 0 m α + h ) S α w . r . t . q α β , m α = arg max q α β , m α Ξ ( q α β , m α ) / n \begin{align}
[f]=&-\dfrac{1}{\beta }\left\{ \lim_{n\to 0}\lim_{N\to\infty}\dfrac{[Z^n]-1}{nN} \right\}\\
=&-\dfrac{1}{\beta }\left\{ \lim_{n\to 0}\lim_{N\to\infty}\dfrac{\exp\left\{ N\Xi \right\}-1}{nN} \right\}\\
\mathop{=}\limits_{N\Xi\to 0}^{} &-\dfrac{1}{\beta }\lim_{n\to 0}\dfrac{\Xi}{n}\\
=&\dfrac{1}{\beta }\left\{ \dfrac{\beta ^2J^2}{4n}\sum _{\alpha \neq \beta }q^2_{\alpha \beta }+\dfrac{\beta J_0}{2n}\sum_\alpha m_\alpha ^2-\dfrac{1}{4}\beta ^2J^2-\dfrac{1}{n}\log\sum_{\{S^\alpha \}_{\alpha =1}^n} e^L \right\}\\
L=& \beta ^2J^2\sum_{\alpha <\beta }q_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta +\beta \sum_\alpha (J_0m_\alpha +h)S^\alpha \tag{2.15-17}\\
w.r.t.&\,q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha =\mathop{\arg\max}\limits_{q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha }\Xi(q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha ) /n
\end{align} [ f ] = = N Ξ → 0 = = L = w . r . t . − β 1 { n → 0 lim N → ∞ lim n N [ Z n ] − 1 } − β 1 { n → 0 lim N → ∞ lim n N exp { N Ξ } − 1 } − β 1 n → 0 lim n Ξ β 1 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 4 n β 2 J 2 α = β ∑ q α β 2 + 2 n β J 0 α ∑ m α 2 − 4 1 β 2 J 2 − n 1 log { S α } α = 1 n ∑ e L ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ β 2 J 2 α < β ∑ q α β S α S β + β α ∑ ( J 0 m α + h ) S α q α β , m α = q α β , m α arg max Ξ ( q α β , m α ) / n ( 2.15-17 )
Comment:
Now free energy depends on order parameters q α β , m α q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha q α β , m α , instead of all { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n \{S_{i=1}^N\}_{\alpha =1}^n { S i = 1 N } α = 1 n
Exchangablity of lim n \lim_{n} lim n and lim N \lim_N lim N ? I believe that's what results in replica breaking.
Condition to arg max Ξ / n \arg\max \Xi/n arg max Ξ/ n
∂ Ξ / n ∂ ( q α β , m α ) = 0 \dfrac{\partial^{}\Xi/n }{\partial (q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha )^{}}=0 ∂ ( q α β , m α ) ∂ Ξ/ n = 0 :
{ q α β = ⟨ S α S β ⟩ L = [ ⟨ S i α S i β ⟩ ] = [ ⟨ 1 N ∑ i = 1 N S i α S i β ⟩ H r e p l i c a ] m α = ⟨ S α ⟩ L = [ ⟨ S i α ⟩ ] = [ ⟨ 1 N ∑ i = 1 N S i α ⟩ H r e p l i c a ] \begin{align}
\begin{cases}
q_{\alpha \beta }=\langle S^\alpha S^\beta \rangle_L&=[\langle S_i^\alpha S_i^\beta \rangle]=[\langle \dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N S_i^\alpha S_i^\beta \rangle _{\mathcal{H}_\mathrm{replica}}]\\
m_\alpha =\langle S^\alpha \rangle_L&=[\langle S_i^\alpha \rangle]=[\langle \dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^NS_i^\alpha \rangle _{\mathcal{H}_\mathrm{replica}}]
\end{cases}
\end{align} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ q α β = ⟨ S α S β ⟩ L m α = ⟨ S α ⟩ L = [⟨ S i α S i β ⟩] = [⟨ N 1 ∑ i = 1 N S i α S i β ⟩ H replica ] = [⟨ S i α ⟩] = [⟨ N 1 ∑ i = 1 N S i α ⟩ H replica ]
Intuition: q α β q_{\alpha \beta } q α β is the overlap between repica α \alpha α and β \beta β . ⟨ ⋅ ⟩ H r e p l i c a \langle\, \cdot \, \rangle_{\mathcal{H}_\mathrm{replica}} ⟨ ⋅ ⟩ H replica is the distribution of the whole replicas system, while S i α S i β S^\alpha_i S^\beta _i S i α S i β focuses on part of the whole replica system
Thermal equilibrium: r e p l i c a 1 ↔ r e p l i c a 2 ↔ ⋯ ↔ r e p l i c a α \mathrm{replica1}\leftrightarrow\mathrm{replica2}\leftrightarrow\cdots\leftrightarrow\mathrm{replica}\alpha replica1 ↔ replica2 ↔ ⋯ ↔ replica α at t → ∞ , β → ∞ t\to \infty, \beta \to \infty t → ∞ , β → ∞ . Spin glass equilibrium: t t t is large but t < ∞ t<\infty t < ∞ , which means that each replica is trapped in its valley → \to → replica symmetry breaking
Semi-positive definite of Hessian ∂ 2 Ξ / n ∂ ∂ T ( q α β , m α ) \dfrac{\partial^{2} \Xi/n}{\partial \partial ^T (q_{\alpha \beta },m_\alpha )} ∂ ∂ T ( q α β , m α ) ∂ 2 Ξ/ n
Another intuition from ensemble theory:
To study how states changes when reaching equilibrium at t → ∞ t\to \infty t → ∞ , you can either:
obsereve one system till t → ∞ t\to \infty t → ∞
or observe n → ∞ n\to \infty n → ∞ systems simultanously
Perhaps replica would be similar to ensemble? then n → 0 n\to 0 n → 0 would be similar to t < ∞ t<\infty t < ∞ , which is the spin glass state time scale. But I haven't seen any work talking about such analogy.
Appendix B -- Parisi Solution
(B.1)
Lemma (1):
exp [ ∂ ∂ h β ] exp [ ∑ α h α S α ] = ∑ i = 0 ∞ 1 i ! ∂ i ∂ h β i exp [ ∑ α h α S α ] = ∑ i = 0 ∞ 1 i ! ( S β ) i exp [ ∑ α h α S α ] = exp [ S β ] exp [ ∑ α h α S α ] ⇒ exp [ q α β ∂ 2 ∂ h α h β ] exp [ ∑ α S α ] = exp [ q α β S α S β + ∑ α h α S α ] \begin{align}
\exp\left[ \dfrac{\partial^{} }{\partial h_\beta } \right]\exp\left[ \sum_{\alpha }h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]=&\sum_{i=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{i!}\dfrac{\partial^{i} }{\partial h_\beta ^i}\exp\left[ \sum_\alpha h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]\\
=&\sum_{i=0}^\infty\dfrac{1}{i!}(S^\beta )^i\exp\left[ \sum_{\alpha }h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]\\
=&\exp\left[ S^\beta \right]\exp\left[ \sum_{\alpha }h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]\\
\Rightarrow \exp\left[ q_{\alpha \beta }\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h_\alpha h_\beta } \right]\exp\left[ \sum_{\alpha }S^\alpha \right]=&\exp\left[ q_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta+\sum_{\alpha }h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]
\end{align} exp [ ∂ h β ∂ ] exp [ α ∑ h α S α ] = = = ⇒ exp [ q α β ∂ h α h β ∂ 2 ] exp [ α ∑ S α ] = i = 0 ∑ ∞ i ! 1 ∂ h β i ∂ i exp [ α ∑ h α S α ] i = 0 ∑ ∞ i ! 1 ( S β ) i exp [ α ∑ h α S α ] exp [ S β ] exp [ α ∑ h α S α ] exp [ q α β S α S β + α ∑ h α S α ]
G = T r exp [ 1 2 ∑ α , β n q α β S α S β + h ∑ α n S α ] = exp [ 1 2 ∑ α , β q α β ∂ 2 ∂ h α h β ] T r exp [ ∑ α h α S α ] ∣ h α = h = exp [ 1 2 ∑ α , β q α β ∂ 2 ∂ h α h β ] ∏ α cosh h α S α ∣ h α = h \begin{align}
G=&\mathrm{Tr}\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{\alpha ,\beta }^nq_{\alpha \beta }S^\alpha S^\beta +h\sum_{\alpha }^nS^\alpha \right]\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{\alpha ,\beta }q_{\alpha \beta}\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h_\alpha h_\beta } \right]\mathrm{Tr}\exp\left[ \sum_{\alpha }h_\alpha S^\alpha \right]\Bigg|_{h_\alpha =h}\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{\alpha ,\beta }q_{\alpha \beta}\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h_\alpha h_\beta } \right]\prod_\alpha \cosh h_\alpha S^\alpha \Bigg|_{h_\alpha =h}\\
\end{align} G = = = Tr exp 2 1 α , β ∑ n q α β S α S β + h α ∑ n S α exp 2 1 α , β ∑ q α β ∂ h α h β ∂ 2 Tr exp [ α ∑ h α S α ] h α = h exp 2 1 α , β ∑ q α β ∂ h α h β ∂ 2 α ∏ cosh h α S α h α = h
(B.8)
g ( x + d x , h ) = exp [ − 1 2 d q ( x ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] g ( x , h ) 1 + d log x g ( x + d x , h ) − g ( x , h ) = { 1 − 1 2 d q ( x ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 } g ( x , h ) 1 + d log x − g ( x , h ) d g ( x , h ) d x = − 1 2 d q ( x ) d x ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 g ( x , h ) + ( g ( x , h ) 1 + d log x − g ( x , h ) ) / d x d g ( x , h ) d x = − 1 2 d q ( x ) d x ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 g ( x , h ) + g ( x , h ) g d log x − g 0 x d log x d g ( x , h ) d x = − 1 2 d q ( x ) d x ∂ 2 g ( x , h ) ∂ h 2 + g ( x , h ) x log g ( x , h ) \begin{align}
g(x+\mathrm{d}x,h )&=\exp\left[ -\dfrac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{d}q(x)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]g(x,h)^{1+\mathrm{d}\log x }\\
g(x+\mathrm{d}x,h )-g(x,h ) &=\left\{ 1-\dfrac{1}{2}\mathrm{d}q(x)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right\}g(x,h)^{1+\mathrm{d}\log x }-g(x,h )\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} g(x,h)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}=&-\dfrac{1}{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} q(x)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h ^{2}}g(x,h)+\left( g(x,h)^{1+\mathrm{d}\log x }-g(x,h) \right)\Big/ \mathrm{d}x\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} g(x,h)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}=&-\dfrac{1}{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} q(x)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h ^{2}}g(x,h)+g(x,h)\dfrac{g^{\,\mathrm{d}\log x}-g^0}{x\,\mathrm{d}\log x}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} g(x,h)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}=&-\dfrac{1}{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{} q(x)}{\mathrm{d}x^{}}\dfrac{\partial^{2}g(x,h) }{\partial h ^{2}}+\dfrac{g(x,h)}{x}\log g(x,h)\\
\end{align} g ( x + d x , h ) g ( x + d x , h ) − g ( x , h ) d x d g ( x , h ) = d x d g ( x , h ) = d x d g ( x , h ) = = exp [ − 2 1 d q ( x ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] g ( x , h ) 1 + d l o g x = { 1 − 2 1 d q ( x ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 } g ( x , h ) 1 + d l o g x − g ( x , h ) − 2 1 d x d q ( x ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 g ( x , h ) + ( g ( x , h ) 1 + d l o g x − g ( x , h ) ) / d x − 2 1 d x d q ( x ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 g ( x , h ) + g ( x , h ) x d log x g d l o g x − g 0 − 2 1 d x d q ( x ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 g ( x , h ) + x g ( x , h ) log g ( x , h )
(B.10)
1 n log T r e L = exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] 1 n log [ g ( m 1 , h ) ] n / m 1 ∣ h → 0 , m 1 → 0 , m 1 − 0 = d x = x → 0 = exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] 1 x log g ( x , h ) ∣ x , h → 0 = exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] f 0 ( 0 , h ) ∣ h → 0 = exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) δ ( h − w ) d w ∣ h → 0 = exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) ∫ v ∈ R 1 2 π exp [ i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w ∣ h → 0 = ∫ w ∈ R ∫ v ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 1 2 π exp [ 1 2 q ( 0 ) ∂ 2 ∂ h 2 ] exp [ i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w ∣ h → 0 ( Lemma 1 ) = ∫ w ∈ R ∫ v ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 1 2 π exp [ − 1 2 q ( 0 ) v 2 + i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w ∣ h → 0 = ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 1 2 π π q ( 0 ) / 2 exp [ − ( w − h ) 2 2 q ( 0 ) ] d w ∣ h → 0 = ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 1 2 π π q ( 0 ) / 2 exp [ − w 2 2 q ( 0 ) ] d w ( w = q 0 u ) = ∫ u f ( 0 , u ) D u \begin{align}
\dfrac{1}{n}\log\mathrm{Tr}e^L=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right] \dfrac{1}{n}\log [g(m_1,h)]^{n/m_1}\Big|_{h\to 0,m_1\to 0,m_1-0=\mathrm{d}x=x\to 0 }\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]\dfrac{1}{x}\log g(x,h)\Big|_{x,h\to 0}\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]f_0(0,h)\Big|_{h\to 0}\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\delta(h-w)\,\mathrm{d}w\Bigg|_{h\to 0}\\
=&\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\int_{v\in\mathbb{R}}\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[ iv(h-w) \right]\,\mathrm{d}v\,\mathrm{d}w\Bigg|_{h\to 0}\\
=&\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}\int_{v\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[ \dfrac{1}{2}q(0)\dfrac{\partial^{2} }{\partial h^{2}} \right]\exp\left[ iv(h-w) \right]\,\mathrm{d}v \,\mathrm{d}w\Bigg|_{h\to 0}\\
(\text{Lemma 1})=&\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}\int_{v\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[ -\dfrac{1}{2}q(0)v^2+iv(h-w) \right]\,\mathrm{d}v \,\mathrm{d}w\Bigg|_{h\to 0}\\
=&\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{q(0)/2}}\exp\left[ \dfrac{-(w-h)^2}{2q(0)} \right]\,\mathrm{d}w\Bigg|_{h\to 0}\\
=&\int_{w\in\mathbb{R}}f_0(0,w)\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{q(0)/2}}\exp\left[ \dfrac{-w^2}{2q(0)} \right]\,\mathrm{d}w\\
(w=\sqrt{q_0}u)=&\int _uf(0,u) \,\mathrm{D}u
\end{align} n 1 log Tr e L = = = = = = ( Lemma 1 ) = = = ( w = q 0 u ) = exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] n 1 log [ g ( m 1 , h ) ] n / m 1 h → 0 , m 1 → 0 , m 1 − 0 = d x = x → 0 exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] x 1 log g ( x , h ) x , h → 0 exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] f 0 ( 0 , h ) h → 0 exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) δ ( h − w ) d w h → 0 exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) ∫ v ∈ R 2 π 1 exp [ i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w h → 0 ∫ w ∈ R ∫ v ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 2 π 1 exp [ 2 1 q ( 0 ) ∂ h 2 ∂ 2 ] exp [ i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w h → 0 ∫ w ∈ R ∫ v ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 2 π 1 exp [ − 2 1 q ( 0 ) v 2 + i v ( h − w ) ] d v d w h → 0 ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 2 π 1 q ( 0 ) /2 π exp [ 2 q ( 0 ) − ( w − h ) 2 ] d w h → 0 ∫ w ∈ R f 0 ( 0 , w ) 2 π 1 q ( 0 ) /2 π exp [ 2 q ( 0 ) − w 2 ] d w ∫ u f ( 0 , u ) D u